Updated the script today. There are a few small things I want to update in addition to today's updates. After this, I will go over the script with the actors cast to clean up their dialog and make it sound good coming out of them. The it will be time to make a massive shooting bible (best that I can with not all locations nailed down).
Fun. Had a good audition last night. Have some more to plan. I am excited. Starting to work on getting some more practical things out of the way.
Prop man may have went away (don't know for sure), but I'm working around that. I starting looking for a new one, but have had little success. I think I can handle it on my own though.
Should have the website in somewhat presentable form soon... soon.
Tuesday, March 30, 2010
Monday, March 29, 2010
FRESH POTS!
I will get an update on some crew people times two this week since I am behind.
I made a website last week and will try to get it worth looking at this week. That is not 100% since there is some stuff going on. I wasn't going to bother, but I figured some people do care about appearances, so prior to fund building, I built that. Went to a lot of the Gatlinburg film fest this past weekend. I like seeing what the local filmmakers have been involved with and want to support them.
I have some auditions today. Maybe I will talk more about them later, but that depends on how it goes.
I tested (sort of) my homemade steadicam yesterday. It works pretty well. It is a simple piece and I may be a few others (more complex) to see how they work as well. I may not, this one is simple and may work just fine.
Below... enjoy FRESH POTS!
I made a website last week and will try to get it worth looking at this week. That is not 100% since there is some stuff going on. I wasn't going to bother, but I figured some people do care about appearances, so prior to fund building, I built that. Went to a lot of the Gatlinburg film fest this past weekend. I like seeing what the local filmmakers have been involved with and want to support them.
I have some auditions today. Maybe I will talk more about them later, but that depends on how it goes.
I tested (sort of) my homemade steadicam yesterday. It works pretty well. It is a simple piece and I may be a few others (more complex) to see how they work as well. I may not, this one is simple and may work just fine.
Below... enjoy FRESH POTS!
Thursday, March 25, 2010
Pull your fingers out of your.... ears. V1
Now time for me to force music of merit onto you. I said it up front, so you know what to expect.
.jpg)
MURDER BY DEATH
.jpg)
Something I get sick of often, is country music. Something I get sick of even more frequently is complaining there is no good country music. It is terrible by and large. But here is a secret, it has almost always been terrible. I love the genre. Let me repeat, I love it. The really strong artists are rare and almost always overshadowed by the bad ones. The point is that great artists are always on the fringe of the scene and that they are there representing the best of what the genre can do.
That being said, I want to tell you about one of my favorite groups, Murder by Death. The group hails from Bloomington, IN and has four full length albums under their belts (with a fifth coming in a week or so). Every album they have made is incredibly strong and you can't go wrong with any of them. The group may or may not like being labeled a country act (sometimes I see them listed as Alt-Country), but including them there is meant in the best possible way. This is a group that recalls Johnny Cash and Merle Haggard, all while putting their own stamp on the sound.
This is one of the few bands I would wholly recommend to anyone. Like the best of the genre, song topics often include murder, whiskey, women, money and god. Each album has a distinctive sound and is worthy of a listen (in addition to a purchase). The music has a roots rock and country flavor that is anchored by Adam Turla's deep vocal delivery. Songs have a strong sense of melody and have the power to transport you to where ever they are about.... which is often a place of six shooters where the spilt whiskey mingles with split blood. Great stuff.
If I had to suggest an album as a jumping on point or a hook to get into the band, I would suggest either Who Will Survive, And What Will Be Left of Them? or Red of Tooth and Claw. Who Will Survive is what hooked me on the band. It is a concept album about the devil coming to a small Mexican border town and the hell they bring upon themselves. If a concept album with a story appeals to you, go this route. Red of Tooth and Claw is probably their strongest collection of songs and is a bit punchier than their other releases. If you like Johnny Cash and how his songs move along, this is a great album for you.
Oh... their first album has a song called Holy Lord, Shawshank Redemption is Such a Good Movie! - seriously.
Murder by Death consists of four member - Adam Turla (vocals and guitar), Matt Armstrong (bass), Sarah Balliet (cello, keys), and Dagan Thogerson (drums). Vincent Edwards plays keys in what seems to be an on again/off again capacity.
Below are links to the two recommended starting point albums. Below that is a song. I would recommend going to THEIR WEBSITE if you want to order their newest album Good Morning, Mag Pie. Doing so will more than likely net you some nice goodies directly from the band themselves and it only costs 10 bucks.
Tuesday, March 23, 2010
Don't sleep on this... Vol 1
This is a whenever I feel like it feature that will detail a film that I feel is under seen, misunderstood, relevant for today, or just plain needs talking about. I want this to be about movies that matter (or should matter). Movies that show the power that the art form can have on people. I will try to do one every two weeks.
PLANET OF THE APES
This first installment is an easy one. Easy because I slept on this film. I had seen it years ago, of course. But I had a weird amalgamation of ideas that were all the films rolled into one and I had disdain for the mostly worthless Tim Burton remake from 2001. But I recently rewatched the first film and was floored by how ahead of its time it was (and still is) and by its overall quality.
For a film that is a bit of a goofy late 60's sci-fi piece, it sure has a lot going. You may recall the film having some kitsch. It may be there in a tiny amount, not near the amount you might recall. Let's move past that and revisit a great film. This is largely spoiler free in terms of actual plot progression.
I was surprised on my recent watch at Charlton Heston. Don't get me wrong, I don't discount him. He has some wonderful early 70's movies that are a blast to revisit to this day (Omega Man, Soylent Green spring to mind). But given his image, I was surprised he would be in a film like Planet of the Apes. But his ridiculous red blooded American image improves the film and makes that much more of a contrast for the state of things on the ape planet. He is the perfect foil for the filmmakers to paint their picture.
Not long into the film, there is some very obvious set piece that shows the brutality of hunting and killing for sport. I am no tree hugging vegan, but I found this very poignant. Like many things in the film, it is presented a face value. The simple juxtaposition of the switched roles is all that is needed to make it hit home and be felt by any viewer. Directly prior to the scene really taking off, there is a line "Blessed are the vegetarians." It is said simply because our heroes are glad that they didn't stumble upon something that would try to eat them, but it directly telegraphs the intent of the scene that follows. Even today we are privy to some needlessly inhumane practices towards animals.
That is just an early set piece, but the message is held throughout the film. Other themes are within the same contexts, including class/race relations. This is woven in with a fair amount of subtlety and are witnessed by a simple, yet brilliant caste system that where differing simian races are given higher or lower status. It works so well due to the fact that it is shown and not overly discussed. We pick up on it immediately as it unfortunately mirrors much of what we have seen in our own world. The treatment of humans even slips in here as a picture of how we have treated other peoples/races and is not just a comment on the treatment of animals. Some people were really thought no better than animals, I am sure I don't have to remind anyone of that.
One of the most overt and powerful themes presented is the need for a separation in church & state. Again, it is presented in such a simple and powerful way that one would be foolish to argue against it. Why does a 1968 Charlton Heston film about an ape planet present this in a better way than most can today? The film clearly illustrates the conflict of interest that comes when these two things are combined. It doesn't condemn one or the other, but when they're together - it is a recipe for disaster. A third grader could watch this and see how ludicrous this combination is... which makes it all the more sad that there are many adults who don't grasp this concept. One, I might add, that is wholly American.
The reason I think it can be said that the film doesn't talk down to religion by itself is due to the powerful look at human nature that is presented by the ape's theology. Their belief system is set up in a way that gives a harsh evaluation on the destructive nature of man that rings true. Conversely, one could point out that the apes shouldn't follow some things so blindly and without their own evaluation. Some do, some don't. Which again reflects reality as well as keeping things fairly level. I think most people can appreciate this approach.
That is a quick (?) look at some themes from Planet of the Apes that feel relevant even today. The fact that this film was made over 40 years ago is eye opening. It is really solid filmmaking and I encourage everyone to take a look at it again if given the chance (it is on Netflix watch instantly). This film is now held in high regards amongst my sci-fi favorites. If you like this film and want more, the wonderful District 9 came out this past year and is more socially relevant sci-fi done right. I hear they are making (trying) a prequel to the series, here is hoping it stands with this classic and is not a forgettable exercise like the 2001 remake.
PLANET OF THE APES
This first installment is an easy one. Easy because I slept on this film. I had seen it years ago, of course. But I had a weird amalgamation of ideas that were all the films rolled into one and I had disdain for the mostly worthless Tim Burton remake from 2001. But I recently rewatched the first film and was floored by how ahead of its time it was (and still is) and by its overall quality.
For a film that is a bit of a goofy late 60's sci-fi piece, it sure has a lot going. You may recall the film having some kitsch. It may be there in a tiny amount, not near the amount you might recall. Let's move past that and revisit a great film. This is largely spoiler free in terms of actual plot progression.
I was surprised on my recent watch at Charlton Heston. Don't get me wrong, I don't discount him. He has some wonderful early 70's movies that are a blast to revisit to this day (Omega Man, Soylent Green spring to mind). But given his image, I was surprised he would be in a film like Planet of the Apes. But his ridiculous red blooded American image improves the film and makes that much more of a contrast for the state of things on the ape planet. He is the perfect foil for the filmmakers to paint their picture.
Not long into the film, there is some very obvious set piece that shows the brutality of hunting and killing for sport. I am no tree hugging vegan, but I found this very poignant. Like many things in the film, it is presented a face value. The simple juxtaposition of the switched roles is all that is needed to make it hit home and be felt by any viewer. Directly prior to the scene really taking off, there is a line "Blessed are the vegetarians." It is said simply because our heroes are glad that they didn't stumble upon something that would try to eat them, but it directly telegraphs the intent of the scene that follows. Even today we are privy to some needlessly inhumane practices towards animals.
That is just an early set piece, but the message is held throughout the film. Other themes are within the same contexts, including class/race relations. This is woven in with a fair amount of subtlety and are witnessed by a simple, yet brilliant caste system that where differing simian races are given higher or lower status. It works so well due to the fact that it is shown and not overly discussed. We pick up on it immediately as it unfortunately mirrors much of what we have seen in our own world. The treatment of humans even slips in here as a picture of how we have treated other peoples/races and is not just a comment on the treatment of animals. Some people were really thought no better than animals, I am sure I don't have to remind anyone of that.
One of the most overt and powerful themes presented is the need for a separation in church & state. Again, it is presented in such a simple and powerful way that one would be foolish to argue against it. Why does a 1968 Charlton Heston film about an ape planet present this in a better way than most can today? The film clearly illustrates the conflict of interest that comes when these two things are combined. It doesn't condemn one or the other, but when they're together - it is a recipe for disaster. A third grader could watch this and see how ludicrous this combination is... which makes it all the more sad that there are many adults who don't grasp this concept. One, I might add, that is wholly American.
The reason I think it can be said that the film doesn't talk down to religion by itself is due to the powerful look at human nature that is presented by the ape's theology. Their belief system is set up in a way that gives a harsh evaluation on the destructive nature of man that rings true. Conversely, one could point out that the apes shouldn't follow some things so blindly and without their own evaluation. Some do, some don't. Which again reflects reality as well as keeping things fairly level. I think most people can appreciate this approach.
That is a quick (?) look at some themes from Planet of the Apes that feel relevant even today. The fact that this film was made over 40 years ago is eye opening. It is really solid filmmaking and I encourage everyone to take a look at it again if given the chance (it is on Netflix watch instantly). This film is now held in high regards amongst my sci-fi favorites. If you like this film and want more, the wonderful District 9 came out this past year and is more socially relevant sci-fi done right. I hear they are making (trying) a prequel to the series, here is hoping it stands with this classic and is not a forgettable exercise like the 2001 remake.
Saturday, March 20, 2010
I do so have a crew... Part 2
I didn't know where to start this first real installment (I don't count myself). I think I will start with my friend Jason (and it was his birthday this week). He and his family were like a family to me while I lived in LA. He was the only person who had a role written specifically for him in this script. A dangerous practice I've learned in the past, but one I felt comfortable doing this time around.
ACTOR
Jason Moore
Jason Moore. While being friends with him in LA, I thought... hmm... this guy would be good on film. He is a character, but also very fierce and sincere. I challenge anyone to spend some time with him and not laugh. A lot. CHALLENGE! So, I wrote a character with him in mind. Turns out he had done some acting in the past, so my instincts were right. He graciously accepted the part and is someone who has read the whole script (a past incarnation at least).
He will be one of the few imports for the film, as I will bring him from LA to shoot. We have already gone over his dialog and hammered out what works for him. It is a large section of the script and one that has not changed much over many drafts. And for that, I am thankful.
I think his character will bring a lot of energy to the film. It should be memorable and funny. With some heavy themes and dourness (par for the course with me, it seems), the character is needed to shine some light even in an unconventional method. But even with all that other stuff, he will fit right in with the surreal tone of the film.
I'm glad to have him on board. I'm even more glad to count him as a good friend.
ACTOR
Jason Moore
Jason Moore. While being friends with him in LA, I thought... hmm... this guy would be good on film. He is a character, but also very fierce and sincere. I challenge anyone to spend some time with him and not laugh. A lot. CHALLENGE! So, I wrote a character with him in mind. Turns out he had done some acting in the past, so my instincts were right. He graciously accepted the part and is someone who has read the whole script (a past incarnation at least).
He will be one of the few imports for the film, as I will bring him from LA to shoot. We have already gone over his dialog and hammered out what works for him. It is a large section of the script and one that has not changed much over many drafts. And for that, I am thankful.
I think his character will bring a lot of energy to the film. It should be memorable and funny. With some heavy themes and dourness (par for the course with me, it seems), the character is needed to shine some light even in an unconventional method. But even with all that other stuff, he will fit right in with the surreal tone of the film.
I'm glad to have him on board. I'm even more glad to count him as a good friend.
Vampire fiction... it can still be worthwhile.
Been a rough week. Will do two updates today. Maybe three. I cast three roles and that is good. Still working on some others.
First is a recommendation on a new comic book. Before I go into that, I should say works of vampire fiction of late have been better as a whole maybe than they ever have been. I know what most of you are thinking (the sane ones, that is)... but D, there is a this big, awful beast of a thing that has made the fiction look ridiculous.
You are right. But in its shadow are some really great works. Written fiction like The Strain from Guillermo Del Toro & Chuck Hogan, Baltimore from Mike Mignola & Christopher Golden. 30 Day of Night (Steve Niles, Ben Templesmith) from several years back that jump started an entire genre in the comics industry. The movie side of things has fared even better. Chan Wook Park's Thirst. The truly great Let the Right One In.
Those examples are simply meant to illustrate that stories about vampires will always be fertile ground for a good storyteller and will always appeal to people. The whys would be a much longer post than this, but you hopefully see the point. I left off many examples from recent years. Now why people will settle for sub par works in this field when greatness abounds, I'll never know. Anyways, on to the recommendation.
A new Vertigo Comics series by the name of American Vampire. Vertigo has tried to cash in on the vampire trend in the past and failed (Bite Club, ugh). So, under normal circumstances I would not have given this a chance. However, this is not a normal circumstance... you see, this has original just for comics work by Stephen King (a first, I think).
Let's take a look at the first issue's classy cover.
The series was created by Scott Snyder. I am glad this book introduced me to him, as he is a talented writer. The book has two loosely related stories (these first two stories will run the first five issues, I believe). The first story is written by Snyder with the second being written by King. Both are of high quality. One is set in 1920's Hollywood and one in the 1880's Wild West. Good stuff. Both stories are illustrated by someone else who is mostly new to my eyes. Rafael Albuquerque does a great job bringing these tales to life. His art fits the book perfectly and really brings the package together. Each storyline also has distinct visual feel, this is in large part to colorist Dave McCaig (who does a bang up job).
I am completely on board with this book and looking forward to where it will go in the future. Many other decades throughout America's history are promised to be grounds that will be traveled. The two starting points (Wild West and 20's Hollywood) are an amazing way to kick things off. I have a sneaking suspicion that this book will be pretty big. I also would not be surprised if a TV series came about soon (since vampires are the vogue thing, and we already have True Blood and Vampire Diaries). This is one of the few comic series I can recommend to ANYONE (the Unwritten being another recent one). So, get on board.
You could also get the FIRST TRADE... in October.
PS - Justified on FX was great. I am sure they will be replaying the first episode. I would watch it and start tuning in on Tuesdays.
First is a recommendation on a new comic book. Before I go into that, I should say works of vampire fiction of late have been better as a whole maybe than they ever have been. I know what most of you are thinking (the sane ones, that is)... but D, there is a this big, awful beast of a thing that has made the fiction look ridiculous.
You are right. But in its shadow are some really great works. Written fiction like The Strain from Guillermo Del Toro & Chuck Hogan, Baltimore from Mike Mignola & Christopher Golden. 30 Day of Night (Steve Niles, Ben Templesmith) from several years back that jump started an entire genre in the comics industry. The movie side of things has fared even better. Chan Wook Park's Thirst. The truly great Let the Right One In.
Those examples are simply meant to illustrate that stories about vampires will always be fertile ground for a good storyteller and will always appeal to people. The whys would be a much longer post than this, but you hopefully see the point. I left off many examples from recent years. Now why people will settle for sub par works in this field when greatness abounds, I'll never know. Anyways, on to the recommendation.
A new Vertigo Comics series by the name of American Vampire. Vertigo has tried to cash in on the vampire trend in the past and failed (Bite Club, ugh). So, under normal circumstances I would not have given this a chance. However, this is not a normal circumstance... you see, this has original just for comics work by Stephen King (a first, I think).
Let's take a look at the first issue's classy cover.
The series was created by Scott Snyder. I am glad this book introduced me to him, as he is a talented writer. The book has two loosely related stories (these first two stories will run the first five issues, I believe). The first story is written by Snyder with the second being written by King. Both are of high quality. One is set in 1920's Hollywood and one in the 1880's Wild West. Good stuff. Both stories are illustrated by someone else who is mostly new to my eyes. Rafael Albuquerque does a great job bringing these tales to life. His art fits the book perfectly and really brings the package together. Each storyline also has distinct visual feel, this is in large part to colorist Dave McCaig (who does a bang up job).
I am completely on board with this book and looking forward to where it will go in the future. Many other decades throughout America's history are promised to be grounds that will be traveled. The two starting points (Wild West and 20's Hollywood) are an amazing way to kick things off. I have a sneaking suspicion that this book will be pretty big. I also would not be surprised if a TV series came about soon (since vampires are the vogue thing, and we already have True Blood and Vampire Diaries). This is one of the few comic series I can recommend to ANYONE (the Unwritten being another recent one). So, get on board.
You could also get the FIRST TRADE... in October.
PS - Justified on FX was great. I am sure they will be replaying the first episode. I would watch it and start tuning in on Tuesdays.
Monday, March 15, 2010
Justified on FX
FX's new series Justified premieres tomorrow at 10 PM. It is being billed as the ultimate modern western and the reviews thus far have been very positive. FX can hit series out of the park when it wants, just see the Shield or Damages. This one stars Timmy Olyphant and Walton Goggins (Shane from the Shield) has been featured prominently in the previews.
Jump on with episode 1 tomorrow!
Saturday, March 13, 2010
I do so have a crew... Part 1
Alright. Here is what will be a weekly or so blog that details who is involved in helping me make this film. The first installment is boring, as it is me and you know me.
Today was not a good day. I had auditions and they didn't go. Not that they didn't go well... THEY DIDN'T GO. No shows. First time ever. Frustrating a bit.
Anyways, on with the show...
WRITER/DIRECTOR/CLOWN
Daniel Fersner
Daniel Fersner. That is me. You know this. I have been trying to make a film for about a decade now. Which is a bit staggering to think about. I have had two misfires, but those were very nice learning experiences (despite the stress caused). I have studied film from all over the world from every decade of its existence. I like to think I have a pretty good handle on what works for film as an art form.
The current script has been worked on for about a year now and is definitely the most "complete" script I have written. Regardless of anything else, time has certainly helped my writing. I always want to deliver a small, honest story with big happenings going on all around. I want honesty and depth of character.
One thing I find difficult is how much to consider an audience (which I'll probably never have anyway). Do I pander to what they would like? I have no doubt I could smash something for an audience... but I have little interest in that. It feels like a terrible thing to do. So, I just make what I would want to see and what I feel does the art form justice. Which means many may be left wondering what is wrong with me...
But I am trying to do this for the sake of storytelling. I have no delusions of fame and fortune. But I do have some good ideas... and I do think some people will be impressed that I do sort of know what I am doing (after all).
That is all I will say on me. Look for more about the great people I have collaborating with me soon!
I just lost an hour... time change.. NO!
Today was not a good day. I had auditions and they didn't go. Not that they didn't go well... THEY DIDN'T GO. No shows. First time ever. Frustrating a bit.
Anyways, on with the show...
WRITER/DIRECTOR/CLOWN
Daniel Fersner
Daniel Fersner. That is me. You know this. I have been trying to make a film for about a decade now. Which is a bit staggering to think about. I have had two misfires, but those were very nice learning experiences (despite the stress caused). I have studied film from all over the world from every decade of its existence. I like to think I have a pretty good handle on what works for film as an art form.
The current script has been worked on for about a year now and is definitely the most "complete" script I have written. Regardless of anything else, time has certainly helped my writing. I always want to deliver a small, honest story with big happenings going on all around. I want honesty and depth of character.
One thing I find difficult is how much to consider an audience (which I'll probably never have anyway). Do I pander to what they would like? I have no doubt I could smash something for an audience... but I have little interest in that. It feels like a terrible thing to do. So, I just make what I would want to see and what I feel does the art form justice. Which means many may be left wondering what is wrong with me...
But I am trying to do this for the sake of storytelling. I have no delusions of fame and fortune. But I do have some good ideas... and I do think some people will be impressed that I do sort of know what I am doing (after all).
That is all I will say on me. Look for more about the great people I have collaborating with me soon!
I just lost an hour... time change.. NO!
Auditions...
Finally back to auditions today.
Look for some news here soon, I think.
I will start my series of people working on this today, with myself. But that will be after I get back.
Enjoy the trailer for the next TRON -
Look for some news here soon, I think.
I will start my series of people working on this today, with myself. But that will be after I get back.
Enjoy the trailer for the next TRON -
Sunday, March 7, 2010
2010 Oscar Blog
Doing my taxes... and starting the Oscars. Academy gets it wrong half the time, but I still find it interesting. Follow along...
Wow... terrible intro graphics. Glad we are in 1993.
Kathy Ireland... terrible announcer.
Enough with the Gyllenhaals already...
These opening interviews are painful.
Really? Zack Efron gets screen time at the awards for the supposed best in the medium? Rob Pattinson will too no doubt. And Kathy Ireland... still doing terrible.
Christopher Plummer and Helen Mirren... some people with actual weight.
I really enjoy when they show these past nominees... Casablanca, you got that right. Wonder how the general public feels about it.
I love that a film with BASTERDS in the title will be repeated all night.
Matthew Broderick is relegated to Sarah Jessica Parker accessory these days...
Cameron Diaz in interviews... shows she isn't the brightest bulb around.
8:22 - Jeff Bridges FTW. That guy rocks.
I guess Meryl Streep will continue to be nominated forever for being her... regardless of the role. She is often great, but often gets noms by just being her.
8:30 and we start. This is different... the best actor/actress people hanging out up front. That guy from Hurt Locker could blow up (no pun) as a star.
NPH kicking it off! YEAH! That's right Harold and Kumar reference at the Oscars.
Alec and Steve always have great chemistry. The set this year is elegant.
Very funny opening dialog.
BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR - Kicking it off with a good one. A no brainer, CHRISTOPH WALTZ.
Waltz gives a nice, sincere speech.
8:51 Blind Side montage. Meh.
BEST ANIMATED FEATURE - Strong field this year. UP wins and it probably wasn't close. I really want to check out the Secret of Kells.
These are presenters... Miley Cyrus? Can't they get someone with some prestige?
BEST ORIGINAL SONG - THE WEARY KIND. Great song and really a stand out from this years nominees. Crazy Heart has great music.
District 9 montage. A truly special and great film. Genre snobbery will keep it from getting close to a win. Yet, if dumbed down, the genre has a chance (see Avatar).
BEST ORIGINAL SCREENPLAY - THE HURT LOCKER. Not really deserved, but perhaps a good sign of things to come for the film. BASTERDS script owned this one. Tarantino not being in WGA really hurts him around awards time.
9:17 - John Hughes montage presented by Molly Ringwold and Matthew Broderick. Almost no other person has had as much impact on pop culture over the last 25 years than John Hughes.
Up montage. Lovely film. Sad there won't be a non-sequel Pixar film for a while.
Nice bit about short films. Criminally under seen format. The net should have made these things explode, but no such luck.
BEST ANIMATED SHORT - LOGORAMA. Never saw it, want to.
BEST DOCUMENTARY SHORT - MUSIC BY PRUDENCE. Never saw it, want to.
LIVE ACTION SHORT - THE NEW TENANTS. Never saw it, want to.
9:38 - Ben Stiller as a Na'Vi. Great.
BEST MAKEUP - STAR TREK. No surprise. Good makeup in that one. Ben Stiller always does good presentations.
A Serious Man montage. Super strong filmmaking. Sad that it wouldn't have even gotten a nom without the 10 picture structure.
BEST ADAPTED SCREENPLAY - PRECIOUS. Meh. Not a knock on the film, but In the Loop is ridiculously great writing. Also, D9 is imagination in overdrive. But Precious feels like a good win.
Governor's awards montage... nice stuff.
BEST SUPPORTING ACTRESS - MO'NIQUE. Well deserved. Two Precious wins in a row. Still wish Melanie Laurent was nominated. Good speech save BET mention.
10:01 - An Education montage. Need to see it.
ART DIRECTION - AVATAR. No surprise. In the speech... Jim Cameron this award SEES YOU... WTF. Avatar boo.
COSTUME DESIGN - THE YOUNG VIC...yawn... er sorry. THE YOUNG VICTORIA. Costume designer is one of the best. Her dress is amazing.
Precious montage. Good stuff.
Kristen Stewart and Tayler Lautner (ugh) giving a horror send up. JAWS of course... but it's Spielberg... what else. Some good stuff. But Twilight is not horror.
SOUND EDITING - THE HURT LOCKER. Deserved.
SOUND MIXING - THE HURT LOCKER. This could spell big trouble for AVATAR.
Inglourious Basterds montage. Travolta. UGH and boo to you. But yay for an amazing film.
10:35 - CINEMATOGRAPHY - AVATAR. This evens the field a bit. How can a movie with almost no cinematography get this award?
The montage of people who died this past year.
What does break dancing have to do with Sherlock Holmes score... And the Hurt Locker gets pop lockin with force wave blasts... WTF. This is terrible. Fantastic Mr Fox... gets the nutters. UP gets Mr. Roboto. Avatar's terrible score gets... bright lights and head spinners. Best score through interpretive dance everyone... terrible.
BEST SCORE - UP. Well deserved. My favorite composer to come on the scene in the last decade. Zimmer's Holmes score was also excellent.
BEST SPECIAL EFFECTS - AVATAR. Of course. Nothing to say, can't knock the effects work... too much. I am tired of everyone who wins from Avatar kissing Cameron's douchey self.
Up in the Air montage. Nice film. Director is a jerk. Not as fantastic as some people try to say, but nice and timely.
BEST DOCUMENTARY - All good films this year. Anvil deserved a nomination, light as it may be. THE COVE wins. No surprise as it was the most high profile, which is what it often comes down to in this category.
Tyler Perry. You sir make terrible films. And you aren't funny as a presenter... imagine that.
BEST EDITING - THE HURT LOCKER. Good. GREAT editing in that film. Worked on Drag Me to Hell too... great work this year from these editors. No competition.
The Hurt Locker montage. Amazing set pieces in that one.
BEST FOREIGN LANGUAGE FILM - This was a possibility. EL SECRETO DE SUS OJOS. The vote was split between people who know good film... The White Ribbon was great and A Prophet is INCREDIBLE. They split, and a film that is more palatable to generic Academy members wins. Ugh.
Avatar montage. Awfully generic film. Much of it is a montage... so a montage for the film is fitting. James Cameron keeps looking like a toolbag.
These actor talking on actor things are always a bit awkward.
BEST ACTOR - JEFF BRIDGES. Deserved out of the nominees. Fairly strong field. Bridges is so much the Dude.
Oprah speaking for Precious... predictable and boring.
BEST ACTRESS - SANDRA BULLOCK. Bleh. Tied for the bottom of the nominees with Meryl's Julia.
BEST DIRECTOR - KATYRN BIGELOW. Super deserved. Tarantino and Lee Daniels did great work too. Streisand was a bit of a bitch for saying the time has come... Lee Daniels looked like he was about to crack with that pressure. He would have been the first black winner. We get the first female winner, which is astounding by itself.
BEST FILM - THE HURT LOCKER. Avatar got shut down and out of big awards. Take that, king of the douche. Hurt Locker is solid and infinitely better than Avatar, but still not the best picture of the year. But it is a small movie that is expertly made, so it is good to see it slay Goliath.
Wow... terrible intro graphics. Glad we are in 1993.
Kathy Ireland... terrible announcer.
Enough with the Gyllenhaals already...
These opening interviews are painful.
Really? Zack Efron gets screen time at the awards for the supposed best in the medium? Rob Pattinson will too no doubt. And Kathy Ireland... still doing terrible.
Christopher Plummer and Helen Mirren... some people with actual weight.
I really enjoy when they show these past nominees... Casablanca, you got that right. Wonder how the general public feels about it.
I love that a film with BASTERDS in the title will be repeated all night.
Matthew Broderick is relegated to Sarah Jessica Parker accessory these days...
Cameron Diaz in interviews... shows she isn't the brightest bulb around.
8:22 - Jeff Bridges FTW. That guy rocks.
I guess Meryl Streep will continue to be nominated forever for being her... regardless of the role. She is often great, but often gets noms by just being her.
8:30 and we start. This is different... the best actor/actress people hanging out up front. That guy from Hurt Locker could blow up (no pun) as a star.
NPH kicking it off! YEAH! That's right Harold and Kumar reference at the Oscars.
Alec and Steve always have great chemistry. The set this year is elegant.
Very funny opening dialog.
BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR - Kicking it off with a good one. A no brainer, CHRISTOPH WALTZ.
Waltz gives a nice, sincere speech.
8:51 Blind Side montage. Meh.
BEST ANIMATED FEATURE - Strong field this year. UP wins and it probably wasn't close. I really want to check out the Secret of Kells.
These are presenters... Miley Cyrus? Can't they get someone with some prestige?
BEST ORIGINAL SONG - THE WEARY KIND. Great song and really a stand out from this years nominees. Crazy Heart has great music.
District 9 montage. A truly special and great film. Genre snobbery will keep it from getting close to a win. Yet, if dumbed down, the genre has a chance (see Avatar).
BEST ORIGINAL SCREENPLAY - THE HURT LOCKER. Not really deserved, but perhaps a good sign of things to come for the film. BASTERDS script owned this one. Tarantino not being in WGA really hurts him around awards time.
9:17 - John Hughes montage presented by Molly Ringwold and Matthew Broderick. Almost no other person has had as much impact on pop culture over the last 25 years than John Hughes.
Up montage. Lovely film. Sad there won't be a non-sequel Pixar film for a while.
Nice bit about short films. Criminally under seen format. The net should have made these things explode, but no such luck.
BEST ANIMATED SHORT - LOGORAMA. Never saw it, want to.
BEST DOCUMENTARY SHORT - MUSIC BY PRUDENCE. Never saw it, want to.
LIVE ACTION SHORT - THE NEW TENANTS. Never saw it, want to.
9:38 - Ben Stiller as a Na'Vi. Great.
BEST MAKEUP - STAR TREK. No surprise. Good makeup in that one. Ben Stiller always does good presentations.
A Serious Man montage. Super strong filmmaking. Sad that it wouldn't have even gotten a nom without the 10 picture structure.
BEST ADAPTED SCREENPLAY - PRECIOUS. Meh. Not a knock on the film, but In the Loop is ridiculously great writing. Also, D9 is imagination in overdrive. But Precious feels like a good win.
Governor's awards montage... nice stuff.
BEST SUPPORTING ACTRESS - MO'NIQUE. Well deserved. Two Precious wins in a row. Still wish Melanie Laurent was nominated. Good speech save BET mention.
10:01 - An Education montage. Need to see it.
ART DIRECTION - AVATAR. No surprise. In the speech... Jim Cameron this award SEES YOU... WTF. Avatar boo.
COSTUME DESIGN - THE YOUNG VIC...yawn... er sorry. THE YOUNG VICTORIA. Costume designer is one of the best. Her dress is amazing.
Precious montage. Good stuff.
Kristen Stewart and Tayler Lautner (ugh) giving a horror send up. JAWS of course... but it's Spielberg... what else. Some good stuff. But Twilight is not horror.
SOUND EDITING - THE HURT LOCKER. Deserved.
SOUND MIXING - THE HURT LOCKER. This could spell big trouble for AVATAR.
Inglourious Basterds montage. Travolta. UGH and boo to you. But yay for an amazing film.
10:35 - CINEMATOGRAPHY - AVATAR. This evens the field a bit. How can a movie with almost no cinematography get this award?
The montage of people who died this past year.
What does break dancing have to do with Sherlock Holmes score... And the Hurt Locker gets pop lockin with force wave blasts... WTF. This is terrible. Fantastic Mr Fox... gets the nutters. UP gets Mr. Roboto. Avatar's terrible score gets... bright lights and head spinners. Best score through interpretive dance everyone... terrible.
BEST SCORE - UP. Well deserved. My favorite composer to come on the scene in the last decade. Zimmer's Holmes score was also excellent.
BEST SPECIAL EFFECTS - AVATAR. Of course. Nothing to say, can't knock the effects work... too much. I am tired of everyone who wins from Avatar kissing Cameron's douchey self.
Up in the Air montage. Nice film. Director is a jerk. Not as fantastic as some people try to say, but nice and timely.
BEST DOCUMENTARY - All good films this year. Anvil deserved a nomination, light as it may be. THE COVE wins. No surprise as it was the most high profile, which is what it often comes down to in this category.
Tyler Perry. You sir make terrible films. And you aren't funny as a presenter... imagine that.
BEST EDITING - THE HURT LOCKER. Good. GREAT editing in that film. Worked on Drag Me to Hell too... great work this year from these editors. No competition.
The Hurt Locker montage. Amazing set pieces in that one.
BEST FOREIGN LANGUAGE FILM - This was a possibility. EL SECRETO DE SUS OJOS. The vote was split between people who know good film... The White Ribbon was great and A Prophet is INCREDIBLE. They split, and a film that is more palatable to generic Academy members wins. Ugh.
Avatar montage. Awfully generic film. Much of it is a montage... so a montage for the film is fitting. James Cameron keeps looking like a toolbag.
These actor talking on actor things are always a bit awkward.
BEST ACTOR - JEFF BRIDGES. Deserved out of the nominees. Fairly strong field. Bridges is so much the Dude.
Oprah speaking for Precious... predictable and boring.
BEST ACTRESS - SANDRA BULLOCK. Bleh. Tied for the bottom of the nominees with Meryl's Julia.
BEST DIRECTOR - KATYRN BIGELOW. Super deserved. Tarantino and Lee Daniels did great work too. Streisand was a bit of a bitch for saying the time has come... Lee Daniels looked like he was about to crack with that pressure. He would have been the first black winner. We get the first female winner, which is astounding by itself.
BEST FILM - THE HURT LOCKER. Avatar got shut down and out of big awards. Take that, king of the douche. Hurt Locker is solid and infinitely better than Avatar, but still not the best picture of the year. But it is a small movie that is expertly made, so it is good to see it slay Goliath.
Saturday, March 6, 2010
Tuesday, March 2, 2010
Auditions have been moved to next week sometime. So, no news on that front.
Starting next week I will probably start doing a blog a week detailing someone who is involved with the film.
A Hurt Locker producer was lobbying for his film to win best picture... which is all fine and well, but then he started lobbying to slam Avatar on the ballots (which is warranted given Avatar's quality), but that is against Academy rules. So, Hurt Locker looked like a good bet to win Best Picture (it's not, but it is better than Avatar), but now... who knows. Makes it more fun at least. That producer is banned from the ceremony now... and probably hurt his career pretty bad.
I will put up my Oscar pics in a day or so.
This is via Chud... about a skit cut due to James Cameron being a baby...
"But one thing we won't be making fun of is a Ben Stiller/Sacha Baron Cohen skit that pokes fun at Avatar and James Cameron. The reason? According to Vulture the Oscar producers think that Cameron is so thin-skinned he could literally walk out of the ceremony. What's so offensive?
Our insider informs us that Baron Cohen planned to appear onstage as a blue-skinned, female Na’vi, with Stiller translating “her” interplanetary speech. As the skit went on, though, it would become clear that Stiller wasn’t translating properly, because Cohen would grow ever more upset. At its climax, an infuriated Baron Cohen would pull open “her” evening gown to reveal that s/he was pregnant, knocked up with Cameron’s love child, and would go on to confront her baby daddy as if s/he were on Jerry Springer.
What's nutty is that this doesn't even sound all that offensive. But then again, I guess when you're a director with a habit of sleeping with your leading ladies, this is a joke that hits close to home. "
Starting next week I will probably start doing a blog a week detailing someone who is involved with the film.
A Hurt Locker producer was lobbying for his film to win best picture... which is all fine and well, but then he started lobbying to slam Avatar on the ballots (which is warranted given Avatar's quality), but that is against Academy rules. So, Hurt Locker looked like a good bet to win Best Picture (it's not, but it is better than Avatar), but now... who knows. Makes it more fun at least. That producer is banned from the ceremony now... and probably hurt his career pretty bad.
I will put up my Oscar pics in a day or so.
This is via Chud... about a skit cut due to James Cameron being a baby...
"But one thing we won't be making fun of is a Ben Stiller/Sacha Baron Cohen skit that pokes fun at Avatar and James Cameron. The reason? According to Vulture the Oscar producers think that Cameron is so thin-skinned he could literally walk out of the ceremony. What's so offensive?
Our insider informs us that Baron Cohen planned to appear onstage as a blue-skinned, female Na’vi, with Stiller translating “her” interplanetary speech. As the skit went on, though, it would become clear that Stiller wasn’t translating properly, because Cohen would grow ever more upset. At its climax, an infuriated Baron Cohen would pull open “her” evening gown to reveal that s/he was pregnant, knocked up with Cameron’s love child, and would go on to confront her baby daddy as if s/he were on Jerry Springer.
What's nutty is that this doesn't even sound all that offensive. But then again, I guess when you're a director with a habit of sleeping with your leading ladies, this is a joke that hits close to home. "
Monday, March 1, 2010
Oscar predictions... thoughts.
No, I haven't seen everything. I give who I think SHOULD win and who I think WILL win. I will also live blog the Oscars for my own enjoyment come Sunday. Check it out if you want to see my thoughts on how it went down.
Actor in a Leading Role
Jeff Bridges in “Crazy Heart”
George Clooney in “Up in the Air”
Colin Firth in “A Single Man”
Morgan Freeman in “Invictus”
Jeremy Renner in “The Hurt Locker”
Who should win: Sam Rockwell in Moon... or Tom Hardy in Bronson. But from here Jeff Bridges.
Who will take the cake: Jeff Bridges with a strong performance.
Actor in a Supporting Role
Matt Damon in “Invictus”
Woody Harrelson in “The Messenger”
Christopher Plummer in “The Last Station”
Stanley Tucci in “The Lovely Bones”
Christoph Waltz in “Inglourious Basterds”
Who should win: Christoph Waltz
Who will take the cake: Christoph Waltz, no contest
Actress in a Leading Role
Sandra Bullock in “The Blind Side”
Helen Mirren in “The Last Station”
Carey Mulligan in “An Education”
Gabourey Sidibe in “Precious: Based on the Novel ‘Push’ by Sapphire”
Meryl Streep in “Julie & Julia”
Who should win: No idea... Gabourey Sidibe? Anyone but Streep.
Who will take the cake: Sandra Bullock
Actress in a Supporting Role
Penélope Cruz in “Nine”
Vera Farmiga in “Up in the Air”
Maggie Gyllenhaal in “Crazy Heart”
Anna Kendrick in “Up in the Air”
Mo’Nique in “Precious: Based on the Novel ‘Push’ by Sapphire”
Who should win: Mélanie Laurent in Inglourious Basterds... Oh wait... no nomination? Mo'Nique for her stance against Oscar campaigning.
Who will take the cake: Mo'Nique
Animated Feature Film
“Coraline” Henry Selick
“Fantastic Mr. Fox” Wes Anderson
“The Princess and the Frog” John Musker and Ron Clements
“The Secret of Kells” Tomm Moore
“Up” Pete Docter
Who should win: I find Fantastic Mr. Fox to be delightfully off kilter.
Who will take the cake: Up, and it's not undeserving.
Art Direction
“Avatar” Art Direction: Rick Carter and Robert Stromberg; Set Decoration: Kim Sinclair
“The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus” Art Direction: Dave Warren and Anastasia Masaro; Set Decoration: Caroline Smith
“Nine” Art Direction: John Myhre; Set Decoration: Gordon Sim
“Sherlock Holmes” Art Direction: Sarah Greenwood; Set Decoration: Katie Spencer
“The Young Victoria” Art Direction: Patrice Vermette; Set Decoration: Maggie Gray
Who should win: Avatar
Who will take the cake: Avatar
Cinematography
“Avatar” Mauro Fiore
“Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince” Bruno Delbonnel
“The Hurt Locker” Barry Ackroyd
“Inglourious Basterds” Robert Richardson
“The White Ribbon” Christian Berger
Who should win: “Inglourious Basterds” Robert Richardson
Who will take the cake: “The Hurt Locker” Barry Ackroyd
Costume Design
“Bright Star” Janet Patterson
“Coco before Chanel” Catherine Leterrier
“The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus” Monique Prudhomme
“Nine” Colleen Atwood
“The Young Victoria” Sandy Powell
Who should win: “The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus” Monique Prudhomme
Who will take the cake: “Coco before Chanel” Catherine Leterrier
Directing
“Avatar” James Cameron
“The Hurt Locker” Kathryn Bigelow
“Inglourious Basterds” Quentin Tarantino
“Precious: Based on the Novel ‘Push’ by Sapphire” Lee Daniels
“Up in the Air” Jason Reitman
Who should win: “The Hurt Locker” Kathryn Bigelow
Who will take the cake: “The Hurt Locker” Kathryn Bigelow
Film Editing
“Avatar” Stephen Rivkin, John Refoua and James Cameron
“District 9” Julian Clarke
“The Hurt Locker” Bob Murawski and Chris Innis
“Inglourious Basterds” Sally Menke
“Precious: Based on the Novel ‘Push’ by Sapphire” Joe Klotz
Who should win: “The Hurt Locker” Bob Murawski and Chris Innis
Who will take the cake: “The Hurt Locker” Bob Murawski and Chris Innis
Foreign Language Film
“Ajami” Israel
“The Milk of Sorrow (La Teta Asustada)” Peru
“A Prophet (Un Prophète)” France
“The Secret in Their Eyes (El Secreto de Sus Ojos)” Argentina
“The White Ribbon (Das Weisse Band)” Germany
Who should win: A Prophet (thank you, European DVD release). This is a seriously major work of cinema that can stand with some big films.
Who will take the cake: The White Ribbon - A very strong film that has beat A Prophet almost universally. But it is not the superior work (though both are incredibly good).
Makeup
“Il Divo” Aldo Signoretti and Vittorio Sodano
“Star Trek” Barney Burman, Mindy Hall and Joel Harlow
“The Young Victoria” Jon Henry Gordon and Jenny Shircore
Who should win: “Star Trek” Barney Burman, Mindy Hall and Joel Harlow
Who will take the cake: “Star Trek” Barney Burman, Mindy Hall and Joel Harlow
Music (Original Score)
“Avatar” James Horner
“Fantastic Mr. Fox” Alexandre Desplat
“The Hurt Locker” Marco Beltrami and Buck Sanders
“Sherlock Holmes” Hans Zimmer
“Up” Michael Giacchino
Who should win: “Up” Michael Giacchino
Who will take the cake: “Up” Michael Giacchino (why is Avatar nominated here? truly awful score)
Music (Original Song)
“Almost There” from “The Princess and the Frog” Music and Lyric by Randy Newman
“Down in New Orleans” from “The Princess and the Frog” Music and Lyric by Randy Newman
“Loin de Paname” from “Paris 36” Music by Reinhardt Wagner Lyric by Frank Thomas
“Take It All” from “Nine” Music and Lyric by Maury Yeston
“The Weary Kind (Theme from Crazy Heart)” from “Crazy Heart” Music and Lyric by Ryan Bingham and T Bone Burnett
Who should win: “The Weary Kind (Theme from Crazy Heart)” from “Crazy Heart” Music and Lyric by Ryan Bingham and T Bone Burnett
Who will take the cake: “The Weary Kind (Theme from Crazy Heart)” from “Crazy Heart” Music and Lyric by Ryan Bingham and T Bone Burnett
Sound Editing
“Avatar” Christopher Boyes and Gwendolyn Yates Whittle
“The Hurt Locker” Paul N.J. Ottosson
“Inglourious Basterds” Wylie Stateman
“Star Trek” Mark Stoeckinger and Alan Rankin
“Up” Michael Silvers and Tom Myers
Who should win: “Star Trek” Mark Stoeckinger and Alan Rankin
Who will take the cake: “Avatar” Christopher Boyes and Gwendolyn Yates Whittle
Sound Mixing
“Avatar” Christopher Boyes, Gary Summers, Andy Nelson and Tony Johnson
“The Hurt Locker” Paul N.J. Ottosson and Ray Beckett
“Inglourious Basterds” Michael Minkler, Tony Lamberti and Mark Ulano
“Star Trek” Anna Behlmer, Andy Nelson and Peter J. Devlin
“Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen” Greg P. Russell, Gary Summers and Geoffrey Patterson
Who should win: “The Hurt Locker” Paul N.J. Ottosson and Ray Beckett
Who will take the cake: “Avatar” Christopher Boyes, Gary Summers, Andy Nelson and Tony Johnson
Visual Effects
“Avatar” Joe Letteri, Stephen Rosenbaum, Richard Baneham and Andrew R. Jones
“District 9” Dan Kaufman, Peter Muyzers, Robert Habros and Matt Aitken
“Star Trek” Roger Guyett, Russell Earl, Paul Kavanagh and Burt Dalton
Who should win: District 9
Who will take the cake: Avatar, can't fault this win. But I find Christopher Johnson from D9 to be an amazing work.
Writing (Adapted Screenplay)
“District 9” Written by Neill Blomkamp and Terri Tatchell
“An Education” Screenplay by Nick Hornby
“In the Loop” Screenplay by Jesse Armstrong, Simon Blackwell, Armando Iannucci, Tony Roche
“Precious: Based on the Novel ‘Push’ by Sapphire” Screenplay by Geoffrey Fletcher
“Up in the Air” Screenplay by Jason Reitman and Sheldon Turner
Who should win: In the Loop, no question. Absolutely fantastic writing.
Who will take the cake: Up in the Air
Writing (Original Screenplay)
“The Hurt Locker” Written by Mark Boal
“Inglourious Basterds” Written by Quentin Tarantino
“The Messenger” Written by Alessandro Camon & Oren Moverman
“A Serious Man” Written by Joel Coen & Ethan Coen
“Up” Screenplay by Bob Peterson, Pete Docter, Story by Pete Docter, Bob Peterson, Tom McCarthy
Who should win: Inglourious Basterds - Tarantino killing it... who TRULY comes close? No one.
Who will take the cake: The Hurt Locker... I think.
Best Picture
“Avatar” James Cameron and Jon Landau, Producers
“The Blind Side” Gil Netter, Andrew A. Kosove and Broderick Johnson, Producers
“District 9” Peter Jackson and Carolynne Cunningham, Producers
“An Education” Finola Dwyer and Amanda Posey, Producers
“The Hurt Locker” Kathryn Bigelow, Mark Boal, Nicolas Chartier and Greg Shapiro, Producers
“Inglourious Basterds” Lawrence Bender, Producer
“Precious: Based on the Novel ‘Push’ by Sapphire” Lee Daniels, Sarah Siegel-Magness and Gary Magness, Producers
“A Serious Man” Joel Coen and Ethan Coen, Producers
“Up” Jonas Rivera, Producer
“Up in the Air” Daniel Dubiecki, Ivan Reitman and Jason Reitman, Producers
Short Film (Animated)
“French Roast” Fabrice O. Joubert
“Granny O’Grimm’s Sleeping Beauty” Nicky Phelan and Darragh O’Connell
“The Lady and the Reaper (La Dama y la Muerte)” Javier Recio Gracia
“Logorama” Nicolas Schmerkin
“A Matter of Loaf and Death” Nick Park
Who should win: Inglourious Basterds - but probably isn't even in the top few of votes.
Who will take the cake: The Hurt Locker. Also, Avatar could take it. Both have run a nasty campaign. The Hurt Locker has much more merit, though.
Whichever of the two wins... it will be one of those things where in 5, maybe 10 years, everyone is like WTF... why did that win Best Picture. Slumdog was one of those last year. 1994 also strikes me as one of those years (off the top of my head)... in what world is Forrest Gump better than Pulp Fiction and the Shawshank Redemption?
In another story of the dirty campaigning this season... Weinstein's have supposedly been torpedoing Hurt Locker, but not building up or pushing their own very worthy film... Basterds. Blows my mind.
Actor in a Leading Role
Jeff Bridges in “Crazy Heart”
George Clooney in “Up in the Air”
Colin Firth in “A Single Man”
Morgan Freeman in “Invictus”
Jeremy Renner in “The Hurt Locker”
Who should win: Sam Rockwell in Moon... or Tom Hardy in Bronson. But from here Jeff Bridges.
Who will take the cake: Jeff Bridges with a strong performance.
Actor in a Supporting Role
Matt Damon in “Invictus”
Woody Harrelson in “The Messenger”
Christopher Plummer in “The Last Station”
Stanley Tucci in “The Lovely Bones”
Christoph Waltz in “Inglourious Basterds”
Who should win: Christoph Waltz
Who will take the cake: Christoph Waltz, no contest
Actress in a Leading Role
Sandra Bullock in “The Blind Side”
Helen Mirren in “The Last Station”
Carey Mulligan in “An Education”
Gabourey Sidibe in “Precious: Based on the Novel ‘Push’ by Sapphire”
Meryl Streep in “Julie & Julia”
Who should win: No idea... Gabourey Sidibe? Anyone but Streep.
Who will take the cake: Sandra Bullock
Actress in a Supporting Role
Penélope Cruz in “Nine”
Vera Farmiga in “Up in the Air”
Maggie Gyllenhaal in “Crazy Heart”
Anna Kendrick in “Up in the Air”
Mo’Nique in “Precious: Based on the Novel ‘Push’ by Sapphire”
Who should win: Mélanie Laurent in Inglourious Basterds... Oh wait... no nomination? Mo'Nique for her stance against Oscar campaigning.
Who will take the cake: Mo'Nique
Animated Feature Film
“Coraline” Henry Selick
“Fantastic Mr. Fox” Wes Anderson
“The Princess and the Frog” John Musker and Ron Clements
“The Secret of Kells” Tomm Moore
“Up” Pete Docter
Who should win: I find Fantastic Mr. Fox to be delightfully off kilter.
Who will take the cake: Up, and it's not undeserving.
Art Direction
“Avatar” Art Direction: Rick Carter and Robert Stromberg; Set Decoration: Kim Sinclair
“The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus” Art Direction: Dave Warren and Anastasia Masaro; Set Decoration: Caroline Smith
“Nine” Art Direction: John Myhre; Set Decoration: Gordon Sim
“Sherlock Holmes” Art Direction: Sarah Greenwood; Set Decoration: Katie Spencer
“The Young Victoria” Art Direction: Patrice Vermette; Set Decoration: Maggie Gray
Who should win: Avatar
Who will take the cake: Avatar
Cinematography
“Avatar” Mauro Fiore
“Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince” Bruno Delbonnel
“The Hurt Locker” Barry Ackroyd
“Inglourious Basterds” Robert Richardson
“The White Ribbon” Christian Berger
Who should win: “Inglourious Basterds” Robert Richardson
Who will take the cake: “The Hurt Locker” Barry Ackroyd
Costume Design
“Bright Star” Janet Patterson
“Coco before Chanel” Catherine Leterrier
“The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus” Monique Prudhomme
“Nine” Colleen Atwood
“The Young Victoria” Sandy Powell
Who should win: “The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus” Monique Prudhomme
Who will take the cake: “Coco before Chanel” Catherine Leterrier
Directing
“Avatar” James Cameron
“The Hurt Locker” Kathryn Bigelow
“Inglourious Basterds” Quentin Tarantino
“Precious: Based on the Novel ‘Push’ by Sapphire” Lee Daniels
“Up in the Air” Jason Reitman
Who should win: “The Hurt Locker” Kathryn Bigelow
Who will take the cake: “The Hurt Locker” Kathryn Bigelow
Film Editing
“Avatar” Stephen Rivkin, John Refoua and James Cameron
“District 9” Julian Clarke
“The Hurt Locker” Bob Murawski and Chris Innis
“Inglourious Basterds” Sally Menke
“Precious: Based on the Novel ‘Push’ by Sapphire” Joe Klotz
Who should win: “The Hurt Locker” Bob Murawski and Chris Innis
Who will take the cake: “The Hurt Locker” Bob Murawski and Chris Innis
Foreign Language Film
“Ajami” Israel
“The Milk of Sorrow (La Teta Asustada)” Peru
“A Prophet (Un Prophète)” France
“The Secret in Their Eyes (El Secreto de Sus Ojos)” Argentina
“The White Ribbon (Das Weisse Band)” Germany
Who should win: A Prophet (thank you, European DVD release). This is a seriously major work of cinema that can stand with some big films.
Who will take the cake: The White Ribbon - A very strong film that has beat A Prophet almost universally. But it is not the superior work (though both are incredibly good).
Makeup
“Il Divo” Aldo Signoretti and Vittorio Sodano
“Star Trek” Barney Burman, Mindy Hall and Joel Harlow
“The Young Victoria” Jon Henry Gordon and Jenny Shircore
Who should win: “Star Trek” Barney Burman, Mindy Hall and Joel Harlow
Who will take the cake: “Star Trek” Barney Burman, Mindy Hall and Joel Harlow
Music (Original Score)
“Avatar” James Horner
“Fantastic Mr. Fox” Alexandre Desplat
“The Hurt Locker” Marco Beltrami and Buck Sanders
“Sherlock Holmes” Hans Zimmer
“Up” Michael Giacchino
Who should win: “Up” Michael Giacchino
Who will take the cake: “Up” Michael Giacchino (why is Avatar nominated here? truly awful score)
Music (Original Song)
“Almost There” from “The Princess and the Frog” Music and Lyric by Randy Newman
“Down in New Orleans” from “The Princess and the Frog” Music and Lyric by Randy Newman
“Loin de Paname” from “Paris 36” Music by Reinhardt Wagner Lyric by Frank Thomas
“Take It All” from “Nine” Music and Lyric by Maury Yeston
“The Weary Kind (Theme from Crazy Heart)” from “Crazy Heart” Music and Lyric by Ryan Bingham and T Bone Burnett
Who should win: “The Weary Kind (Theme from Crazy Heart)” from “Crazy Heart” Music and Lyric by Ryan Bingham and T Bone Burnett
Who will take the cake: “The Weary Kind (Theme from Crazy Heart)” from “Crazy Heart” Music and Lyric by Ryan Bingham and T Bone Burnett
Sound Editing
“Avatar” Christopher Boyes and Gwendolyn Yates Whittle
“The Hurt Locker” Paul N.J. Ottosson
“Inglourious Basterds” Wylie Stateman
“Star Trek” Mark Stoeckinger and Alan Rankin
“Up” Michael Silvers and Tom Myers
Who should win: “Star Trek” Mark Stoeckinger and Alan Rankin
Who will take the cake: “Avatar” Christopher Boyes and Gwendolyn Yates Whittle
Sound Mixing
“Avatar” Christopher Boyes, Gary Summers, Andy Nelson and Tony Johnson
“The Hurt Locker” Paul N.J. Ottosson and Ray Beckett
“Inglourious Basterds” Michael Minkler, Tony Lamberti and Mark Ulano
“Star Trek” Anna Behlmer, Andy Nelson and Peter J. Devlin
“Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen” Greg P. Russell, Gary Summers and Geoffrey Patterson
Who should win: “The Hurt Locker” Paul N.J. Ottosson and Ray Beckett
Who will take the cake: “Avatar” Christopher Boyes, Gary Summers, Andy Nelson and Tony Johnson
Visual Effects
“Avatar” Joe Letteri, Stephen Rosenbaum, Richard Baneham and Andrew R. Jones
“District 9” Dan Kaufman, Peter Muyzers, Robert Habros and Matt Aitken
“Star Trek” Roger Guyett, Russell Earl, Paul Kavanagh and Burt Dalton
Who should win: District 9
Who will take the cake: Avatar, can't fault this win. But I find Christopher Johnson from D9 to be an amazing work.
Writing (Adapted Screenplay)
“District 9” Written by Neill Blomkamp and Terri Tatchell
“An Education” Screenplay by Nick Hornby
“In the Loop” Screenplay by Jesse Armstrong, Simon Blackwell, Armando Iannucci, Tony Roche
“Precious: Based on the Novel ‘Push’ by Sapphire” Screenplay by Geoffrey Fletcher
“Up in the Air” Screenplay by Jason Reitman and Sheldon Turner
Who should win: In the Loop, no question. Absolutely fantastic writing.
Who will take the cake: Up in the Air
Writing (Original Screenplay)
“The Hurt Locker” Written by Mark Boal
“Inglourious Basterds” Written by Quentin Tarantino
“The Messenger” Written by Alessandro Camon & Oren Moverman
“A Serious Man” Written by Joel Coen & Ethan Coen
“Up” Screenplay by Bob Peterson, Pete Docter, Story by Pete Docter, Bob Peterson, Tom McCarthy
Who should win: Inglourious Basterds - Tarantino killing it... who TRULY comes close? No one.
Who will take the cake: The Hurt Locker... I think.
Best Picture
“Avatar” James Cameron and Jon Landau, Producers
“The Blind Side” Gil Netter, Andrew A. Kosove and Broderick Johnson, Producers
“District 9” Peter Jackson and Carolynne Cunningham, Producers
“An Education” Finola Dwyer and Amanda Posey, Producers
“The Hurt Locker” Kathryn Bigelow, Mark Boal, Nicolas Chartier and Greg Shapiro, Producers
“Inglourious Basterds” Lawrence Bender, Producer
“Precious: Based on the Novel ‘Push’ by Sapphire” Lee Daniels, Sarah Siegel-Magness and Gary Magness, Producers
“A Serious Man” Joel Coen and Ethan Coen, Producers
“Up” Jonas Rivera, Producer
“Up in the Air” Daniel Dubiecki, Ivan Reitman and Jason Reitman, Producers
Short Film (Animated)
“French Roast” Fabrice O. Joubert
“Granny O’Grimm’s Sleeping Beauty” Nicky Phelan and Darragh O’Connell
“The Lady and the Reaper (La Dama y la Muerte)” Javier Recio Gracia
“Logorama” Nicolas Schmerkin
“A Matter of Loaf and Death” Nick Park
Who should win: Inglourious Basterds - but probably isn't even in the top few of votes.
Who will take the cake: The Hurt Locker. Also, Avatar could take it. Both have run a nasty campaign. The Hurt Locker has much more merit, though.
Whichever of the two wins... it will be one of those things where in 5, maybe 10 years, everyone is like WTF... why did that win Best Picture. Slumdog was one of those last year. 1994 also strikes me as one of those years (off the top of my head)... in what world is Forrest Gump better than Pulp Fiction and the Shawshank Redemption?
In another story of the dirty campaigning this season... Weinstein's have supposedly been torpedoing Hurt Locker, but not building up or pushing their own very worthy film... Basterds. Blows my mind.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)